Most teams don't have a talent problem. They have a leverage problem: the hours go into handoffs, rework, waiting, and reporting instead of the work itself. Engagements start small because guessing is expensive. We find where the hours actually go first. If it's worth building, I build it. If it keeps paying off, I stay. You're never committed past the point where the value is clear.
A fixed-scope look at one workflow, or one "should we even use AI here" question, traced end to end. You get a ranked list: what's automatable, what it's worth, what the dependencies are, and what isn't worth touching, including the cases where the right answer is to build nothing at all. Short, bounded, and useful on its own even if we stop there.
I design the fix and put it in production: automations, AI agents, LLM-backed tooling, and the measurement that proves it worked. The goal isn't a faster version of today. It's the same team operating at a different scale, with people staying in the loop wherever the work needs judgment. Real software that's documented and maintainable after I leave, not a prototype that impresses in a demo and rots in a month.
For teams that need a senior AI and operations brain in the room without a full-time hire. I steer tooling, mentor the people building, and keep shipping, part-time, hands-on, and accountable for whether things actually work.
His transparency, flexibility and ways to resolve problems with simplicity and efficiency inspired me as a leader.
Flavia Fichmann Gilad · Customer Solutions Engineering Manager, Axonius · former direct report
He has a unique ability to help us non-technical folks better understand complex ideas, while somehow making us feel smarter.
Chief of Staff, managed services firm
His vision, execution, and ownership have been truly transformational for our business.
Senior Director, Strategic Partnerships
Some names withheld. References available on request.
I'll tell you when AI is the answer, and more importantly, when it isn't.
A lot of what I do is talk people out of expensive, fragile ideas and toward the boring thing that will still be running in a year. That honesty is the point. It's what makes the rest of the work worth trusting.