← Work Carson Aft.
Case studyFortune 500 · client not named

Twelve times the throughput. Same team.

A Fortune 500 legal compliance workflow, taken apart, redesigned, then automated. Quality went up sixteen points while throughput went up twelvefold.

Client
Fortune 500 company, legal compliance operation
My role
Engineering lead, process design through production
Throughput
12× the original rate
Quality
+16 points on the team's own quality measure
Headcount
Unchanged

The situation

A compliance team inside a Fortune 500 company was the bottleneck for work the rest of the business was waiting on. The team was competent and working hard. The volume was simply growing faster than people could be hired and trained, and the standard answer, add headcount, had already been tried. Throughput per person had stopped moving years earlier.

What was actually wrong

Not the people, and not effort. The workflow had accreted. Every past mistake had left behind a new checking step, and every checking step applied to every item, no matter how routine. By the time I traced it end to end, most of a person's day went to handoffs between stages, re-review of work that was almost never wrong, and waiting on judgment calls that pooled with whoever was most senior. The actual compliance decision, the part that needs a human, was a small fraction of the cycle time.

The work wasn't slow. Everything around the work was slow.

That diagnosis matters because automating the existing process would have just produced a faster version of a bad layout. The 12× did not come from speeding people up. It came from removing the structure that was eating their time.

What I built

First the process: routine items got separated from genuinely ambiguous ones, redundant checks were collapsed into one verification pass that targeted where errors actually occurred, and judgment calls were routed directly to the person qualified to make them instead of up a chain. Then the automation: the routine path was automated end to end, with logging and sampling so the team could prove, not assume, that the machine path stayed accurate. People kept ownership of every ambiguous case and every sign-off that needed a name on it.

The numbers

Throughput went to twelve times the original rate. Quality rose sixteen points on the team's own measure at the same time. That pair moving together is the signature of a structural fix. If you get speed by cutting corners, quality falls. If both rise at once, the process was the problem.

What the team does now

The same people run a much larger book of work. Their day is judgment, exceptions, and the cases that genuinely need a human, instead of re-checking each other. Nobody was replaced. The team's capacity was the thing that got rebuilt.